
From late February to May of 2020, the foundations of the Western developed world were shaken and weakened. Citizens of the United States and Europe seemed to respond first with denial, then shock, then with slow, chilling recognition that the routines and rules of daily life were disrupted or broken. The recognition of the new truth of our existence moved like a slow wave, and millions were stuck in denial while millions more were forced to stare into the maelstrom by economic and physical necessity. We thought that September 11, 2001, changed everything; it did for the minority directly hit by the physical destruction, the temporary market downturn, and the ensuing military response. But the COVID Wave is sweeping away much of what we assumed was fixed, stable.
Posts on this blog have covered some of my journeys outside of my home country. This one confronts the inward journey caused by the forced solitude required by a mandate to maintain “social distance”, to stay at home. I started limiting social contact in mid-March, and like many others began to explore the technology of web-based conferencing. Mingling with large numbers of people was dangerous; touching other humans was dangerous; journeys outside the home were limited to essential visits to grocery stores. Restaurants, churches, sporting events all closed. Political rallies were cancelled. People scrambled to purchase essential supplies, and in their panic, hoarded excessive amounts of paper products, disinfectants, and medical protection gear. The media was filled with stories about scarcity: of face masks and scrubs (“PPE”, personal protection equipment), of sanitizer, of ICU beds. Small riots erupted, led by those doubting the need to pause.

The drumbeat of grim statistics became the background noise on the media: virus-induced infections, hospitalizations, ventilators, deaths. Politicians loomed in front of cameras to give their daily briefings, which became monotonously repetitive: “millions of virus tests will be shipped next week;” “we’ve got to flatten the curve of hospitalizations;” “just fourteen more days and we can open this beautiful economy back up.” Photos and news clips showed empty spaces and long lines for testing and food banks. The president scurried to photo ops at medical laboratories and hospital ships. And the deadly stats kept climbing.
The frantic pace of a post-industrial, tech-savvy society just came to a dead stop. Millions of extraverted, FaceTiming Americans and Europeans and Asians stared at the walls and their screens and wondered about their food supply and childcare and income. People with stock investments lost a chunk of their wealth. Avid churchgoers wondered how they would continue the facade or the substance of their worship. Some forced to sit at home started online courses, picked up long-deferred reading, became reacquainted with their children’s idiosyncrasies.
For an introvert like me, the quiet alone time seemed a blessing wrapped in a fearful blanket of uncertainty. I would practice my Qi Gong; finish reading those four heavy volumes sitting near my bed; stream all those old movies for a second or third time. But I missed visiting my grandchildren. I took long walks, waving at the many neighbors trying to accomplish the same. I started preparing my gardens though the April chill precluded much vegetable planting; I researched the cold-tolerant early flowers. Pansies and poppies anyone? I am comfortable listening to an inner voice — just not all the time.
But many days were filled, not with an inward journey, but with preparations for increased hours of online tutoring and providing meals for the growing homeless population, and with online Zoom conferences with Quaker committees. Some fellow Quakers grappled with worshipping by teleconference, trying to muster a sense of the Spirit in the silence trembling across miles of fiber-optic cables. Can we summon the Holy Presence, the Shekinah, while staring at a computer screen?
By late April and early May, commentators endeavored to imagine a “reopened” world. Would we all go back to the same pursuits as in pre-COVID times? Would the sudden disappearance of noxious carbon and methane fumes be but a blip in our steady march toward habitat destruction? Leaders preached about “bringing back the good times.” Fights broke out in grocery and fast-food lines, as some lectured others about mask-wearing and social distancing. Rather than seeing a general unification against the insidious unseen enemy, old fault lines were reopened with mortal anger: “Believe the scientists” was opposed by “It’s a liberal hoax.” Those who turned to the old accounts of historic pandemics, from the fourteenth-century Black Death to the early twentieth-century Great Flu Epidemic, noted disturbing parallels: anger, riots, denial, and resurgence caused by premature return to social mingling, now called “opening up.” Camus’ The Plague noted officials’ repeated denials until the bodies in the streets belied them, followed by closing off the city walls.
As I write this in May, doubt and fear rein supreme. I tried to emerge from isolation at the end of April, after six weeks of isolation, by visiting my son and youngest granddaughter. Only to find out two days later that my daughter-in-law’s place of work, a nursing home, reported a new case of the coronavirus. So I retreated back into self-isolation, ordering more books and home supplies. We will not ever be “the same” as before. But we cannot imagine the new world. We wait for the scientists to save us with a vaccine or a cure. While some of us deny that this is really happening.

We see an ugly resurgence of nationalist anger against Asians, making the foreign “Other” a target of our fear since we cannot see the microbe that brings the pestilence into our lives. I doubt people will collectively “learn a lesson” from our myriad fatal errors in confronting the tiny beast; it is tough to maintain Spartan vigilance when times are easy. When the simple act of wearing a protective mask is seen as a sign of liberal politics, how will leaders convince taxpayers to pay millions for defending against the next pandemic? For there will be one.













